Jump to content

Susan Jaques

Moderators
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Susan Jaques last won the day on September 1 2023

Susan Jaques had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Susan Jaques's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. until

    HI Jacinta, the September session link will be provided in early September. We have to get through the August one first I'm glad you're keen! ...It will be a tricky topic to cover SFAIRP/ALARP/AFAP in this format (being open mic/open discussion), but, hey, we'll give it a go.
  2. until

    Thanks Ian, much appreciated. I'll use this in the introduction/framing of the questions. Regarding timezones.... the SoQ sessions are currently scheduled on the last day of the month, at or around lunchtime. I guess that doesn't help those in the UK. Maybe in future we could try late-day sessions. I wonder how many international members would attend if SoQ was at a better timezone...
  3. By Matt Humphrey When you're looking for risk related information, you may find both REBOK and RES coming up in your search results. Both seem to perform the same function of providing information and hosting webinars. So why do they both exist, and what purpose do they serve? Risk Engineering Society (RES) The Risk Engineering Society (RES) is a recognised technical society of Engineers Australia, aiming to advance the practice of risk engineering. What began as a special interest group in Victoria in the late 1970s has since emerged to become an internationally recognised source of risk knowledge and risk engineering professionals. The structure of RES includes a national committee, as well as state-based committees. The RES committees are made up of enthusiastic risk engineering professionals, who volunteer their time to further develop awareness of and support for risk engineers. The tasks of the RES committees include collection and distribution of information to members, organisation of technical meetings, hosting conferences, and contributing to the effective management of risks in the workplace and in the community. RES has traditionally used two primary platforms for communicating learnings to members of the risk engineering community: through LinkedIn, and hosting in-person state-based seminars. During the pandemic of 2020, the state-based RES committees pivoted to hosting webinars online instead, in order to continue providing information to members. RES committees are currently transitioning back to more in-person events with online viewing as an option for many events. It is expected that hybrid events will be offered into the future. Risk Engineering Body of Knowledge (REBOK) Meanwhile, he Risk Engineering Body of Knowledge (REBOK) is a central repository of information and articles for risk engineering professionals. It was launched in 2019 as an initiative by RES, to enhance risk management knowledge and processes in the workplace and the wider community. The online repository contains information in a broad range of mediums, including webinars, presentations, papers, and publications. The overall purpose of REBOK is to provide a wiki (encyclopedia)-like resource to assist engineers and managers to practically apply risk management principles. This information is generally sourced by the REBOK committee or is commissioned either by the RES National Executive or the RES State Chapters across Australia. Current Status Prior to the pandemic, RES and REBOK were acting in complementary roles: state-based in-person seminars by RES, and online lunchtime webinars by REBOK. Post-pandemic, we have been “competing” in the same arena of online conferences and webinars, which brought about some confusion. In order to avoid some of the overlap of efforts, the REBOK team has recently decided to pause hosting lunchtime webinars and leave that to the RES state-based committees. To summarise: RES is a technical society which aims to promote and advance the risk engineering community. REBOK is an initiative of RES and is primarily a repository of risk engineering information. Both aim to distribute information to their members, with RES focusing on its LinkedIn group and seminars/webinars, and REBOK focusing more on the online knowledge repository. As REBOK is a continuously developing project, we invite you to join the REBOK Community and drive its value by contributing your own experience and expertise through posts and discussions. We also invite you to connect with other risk engineering specialists and join the conversation in the Risk Engineering Society LinkedIn Group.
  4. In order to make this site more user-friendly, we are working on a 'project stages overlay'. This overlay will link to relevant knowledge articles within the wiki. So you'll be able to find the information when you need it.REBOK project risk engineering inputs and outputs.docxREBOK project risk engineering inputs and outputs.docx The attached model will eventually be placed on the front page of REBoK, with links to relevant content in the BoK. Our next step is to work on the risk engineering inputs and outputs related to each stage. For example, we're asking ourselves what reports, documents, data, knowledge, etc, related to risk engineering are required at the "Project Initiation" stage?
  5. Hello Yzna, if your question is real, my answer is real. I see risk assessments every time I do a risk workshop facilitation, for asset integrity. In its simplest form, it is a spreadsheet table with columns like "Threat", "Description", "Failure Mode", then "Likelihood", "Consequences" and "Risk Level". But there is a lot more to 'risk assessment' than a spreadsheet. Tell me, what is a TUV class? And I'm curious how you could have 16 years in industrial controls and not seen a risk assessment. They are also done daily before construction in terms of Hazard Identification processes.
  6. HI Jim The document is colourful! Can you give an example of when an engineer would contemplate using the concept of "positive Risk" (I've never heard that term!). In the effort to clarify risk, we should put some context around it. How might this document help an engineer deal with risk for a detail design? Or an operating asset? Or for what task might it help? Susan
×
×
  • Create New...